Foresight GC3 & GCQuad - Which is Right For You?
Choosing between the Foresight GC3 and the GCQuad can be challenging, as both are top-tier launch monitors offering precise data and advanced features.
This comparison will delve into their differences to help you determine which model aligns best with your needs and budget.
Price Comparison: GC3 vs. GCQuad
GC3: Priced at approximately $7,499.
GCQuad: MSRP around $14,000, with additional costs for club data and putting analysis add-ons.
The GC3 offers a more budget-friendly option, while the GCQuad, though more expensive, provides expanded capabilities.
*Pricing may vary. Please see below product links for up to date pricing.
First Impressions and Unboxing
GC3: Features a sleek, compact design with a user-friendly touchscreen interface.
GCQuad: Boasts a robust build with a premium reflective display, indicating its professional-grade status.
Both devices exude quality craftsmanship, with the GCQuad offering a more premium feel.
Setup Process
GC3: Utilizes a triscopic (three-camera) system, allowing straightforward setup with minimal calibration.
GCQuad: Equipped with a quadrascopic (four-camera) system, requiring precise alignment but offering enhanced accuracy.
Both monitors are designed for ease of use, with the GCQuad demanding a bit more attention during setup due to its advanced features.
Portability: GC3 vs. GCQuad
GC3: Weighs 5 lbs with dimensions of 6” (W) x 12” (H) x 5” (D), making it highly portable.
GCQuad: Weighs 7.5 lbs and measures 7” (W) x 12.5” (H) x 4” (D), slightly larger but still manageable for transport.
Both units are designed with portability in mind, with the GC3 being the lighter option.
GC Quad & GC 3 Data Comparison
| Data Type | GC3 | GCQuad |
|---|---|---|
| Ball Data | Yes | Yes |
| Club Data | Limited | Comprehensive |
| Putting Analysis | No | Yes |
The GCQuad provides a more extensive range of club data metrics and includes putting analysis, making it a preferred choice for professionals seeking in-depth insights.
Indoor and Outdoor Use
GC3: Performs exceptionally well in both indoor and outdoor settings.
GCQuad: Offers unparalleled accuracy in all environments, with a larger hitting zone accommodating varied setups.
Both monitors are versatile, with the GCQuad providing a slight edge in adaptability due to its enhanced features.
Simulator Software Compatibility
Both the GC3 and GCQuad are compatible with Foresight Sports' FSX software suite, including FSX 2020 and FSX Play. They also support third-party software like E6 Connect and GSPro, giving you a wide range of simulation options.
No Annual Subscription Costs
GC3: No mandatory annual subscription; however, software updates and additional courses may incur fees. The new GC3S will bring in the same great hardware of the GC3, with a subscription model.
GCQuad: Similar to the GC3, with optional add-ons for expanded features.
Both models offer flexibility regarding ongoing costs, allowing users to choose add-ons based on their needs.
Key Features Comparison
| Feature | GC3 | GCQuad |
|---|---|---|
| Cameras | 3 | 4 |
| Hitting Zone | 7” x 10” | 18” x 14” |
| Battery Life | 5–7 hours | 6–8 hours |
| Display | Standard touchscreen | Premium reflective touchscreen |
| Alignment Stick | Included | Included |
The GCQuad's additional camera and larger hitting zone contribute to its enhanced accuracy and versatility.
Final Verdict: Quad or GC3?
Choose the GC3 if:
- You’re seeking a high-quality launch monitor at a more accessible price point.
- Portability and ease of use are top priorities.
- You require essential ball and limited club data for personal improvement.
- You want simulator compatibility without the full cost of pro-level features.
Choose the GCQuad if:
- You’re a teaching professional, club fitter, or elite player who needs complete ball, club, and putting data.
- You want impact location, lie angle, dynamic loft, and the full breadth of tour-level metrics.
- You value the larger hitting zone and slightly improved accuracy.
- You’re willing to invest in the gold standard for coaching and analysis.
